Non-touch Windows 8 world

Unlike most of my colleagues, my recent Windows 8 experiences have been distinctly non-touch. As it turns out, the only two laptops I’ve reviewed with Microsoft’s new operating system pre-installed both lacked touchscreens: the Sony Vaio E17, and the Toshiba Satellite U845W. Both are what you’d consider “classic” laptops–although the U845W has an unique, extra-wide screen.

Based on these early experiences with two “Windows 8-optimized” laptops, I’m not a fan of the non-touch Windows 8 world.

Escaping The Grid

Honestly, it’s hard to be a fan of non-touch on Windows 8, because there are precious few non-touch enhancements to get excited about. The big exciting part of Windows 8 is its tile-grid of touch-friendly apps. It’s begging for a tablet, or at least a bendy touchscreen, to appreciate. Without either, I feel like I’m missing out on the fun.

But it’s more than that. Windows 8 favors touch, and then bends back to accommodate everyone else. Sure, underneath it all is a pretty standard Windows 7-esque desktop environment…but it’s not all exactly the same. Certain apps and controls are hard to find, or even begin to know how to find. Some apps don’t update perfectly. But Windows 8 pushing this all to the back end feels like the opposite of Mac OS X, which takes all the iOS-like app grids and the Mac App Store itself and pushes it back, out of sight. A Mac starts up like a Mac. A Windows 8 PC starts up like something very different than a Windows 7 PC.

Sure, it just takes a button-press to hop out of The Grid (as I like to call it), or you can tweak settings to avoid this interface. But it’s an alienating first few hours.

Satellite U845W: large trackpad, but still not comfortable.

The Importance of Trackpads

Bad trackpads get shown up in Windows 8. With all the extra gestures, improved accuracy is a must. And, there’s the oddity of off-pad swiping: it brings up Charms and helps find the search bar in Explorer; it switches apps. Many trackpads are recessed, and pulling off an off-edge swipe onto the pad feels uncomfortable…or worse, the move doesn’t register. If you’re a new Windows 8 user, you don’t need the added confusion of gestures that work sometimes, and don’t work other times. It’s all a new enough world as it is.

The Vaio E17 trackpad: way too small.

Unfortunately, a lot of Windows laptops have lousy trackpads. It’s the rare machine that offers a surface large enough, and smooth-responding enough, to do Windows 8 justice.

Both the Sony Vaio E17 and Toshiba Satellite U845W are fine laptops in terms of battery life, performance, and construction. They just lack stellar trackpads. The E17’s is far too small, and the U845W’s is large enough but wasn’t super-responsive. This is common enough in the laptop world, but those trackpads are becoming far more important. I’d also prefer that no Windows 8 trackpad ever be recessed: to pull off the moves requested of you, the user, a flush trackpad with extra room around it is really the way to go.

Would I plug in a larger trackpad or use a mouse? I could, but that feels like the laptop equivalent of orthotic shoes. I don’t want added gear. I want a normal, fast, fun laptop that doesn’t make me want to tear my hair out.

Lenovo’s IdeaPad Yoga 13: archetypal touch convertible laptop.

Who Needs Touch?

Most people don’t need a laptop that swivels into a tablet. I’m not even sure I want one. But if were to buy a Windows 8 laptop, I’d seriously consider giving that a lot of thought.

You can adjust to Windows 8 without a touchscreen. I certainly did. But I don’t know if “adjusting” is the best way to experience a new-feel operating system. As more touch-oriented Windows 8 apps get released, I worry that the touchless world will become ever more alienating. And, as I reached up to instinctively paw at the non-touch screen in the hopes of speeding up my Windows 8 experience and help me escape from odd, full-screen, confusingly minimalist apps, I wondered how long I’d want to live with a brand-new Windows 8 PC that lacked touch.

The iPad worked for me because it had no alternatives: touch is its only interface, and I had no other choice. Windows 8 is admirably flexible, but keeping options open will result in some options being better than others. In the NFL, they say having two starting quarterbacks means you have no starting quarterback. I wonder if that’s the case here with touch and non-touch.

Of course, this is just my opinion. You may find it fine. In fact, installing Windows 8 on an existing laptop is the most likely path for a lot of people. Non-touch laptops are also more affordable, and less experimental hardware tends to be more reliable. But if I were investing in a Windows 8 computer, I’d find it hard not to heavily consider a touchscreen.


Any feedbacks?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s